• 1 - Introduction:
• 2 - The Turing Test?
• 3 - Brave New World?
• 4 - Progress:
• 5 - The problem of Consciousness:
• 6 - Conclusion:

1 - Introduction:

1.1 - Request 1:

1.2 - Request 2:

1.3 - Request 3:

1.4 - Request 4:

2 - The Turing Test?

2.1 - Cultural Knowledge:

2.1.1 - Request 5:

2.2 - Reasoning Ability:

2.2.1 - Request 6:

2.2.2 - Request 7:

2.3 - Imagination:

2.3.1 - Request 8:

3 - Brave New World?

3.1 - Mastery of Natural Languages and their subtleties:

3.1.1 - Request 9:

3.1.2 - Request 10:

3.2 - Self-references:

3.2.1 - Request 11:

3.2.2 - Request 12:

"Cette phrase contient 32 caractères".
 ----- ------ -------- -- ----------
 12345 678901 23456789 01 2345678901

3.3 - Logic:

3.3.1 - Request 13:

3.3.2 - Request 14:

• On 03/14/2019, Emma Harula Iwao calculated 31,415,926,535,897 digits,
• On 01/29/2020, Timothy Mullican reached 50 trillion of digits,
• On 08/2021, the University of Applied Sciences of the Grisons (HES) computed 62.8 trillion digits,
• On 06/09/2022, Emma Harula Iwao, 100 trillion of digits.

3.3.3 - Request 15:

def       is_prime(number):
          if        number<= 1:
                    return    False
          for       i in range(2, int(number ** 0.5) + 1):
                    if        number % i == 0:
                              return    False
          return    True
 
def       find_prime_even_numbers(max_number):
          prime_even_numbers = []
          for       number in range(2, max_number + 1):
                    if        number % 2 == 0 and is_prime(number):
                              prime_even_numbers.append(number)
          return    prime_even_numbers
 
prime_even_numbers = find_prime_even_numbers(100)
print(prime_even_numbers)
 

3.3.4 - Request 16:

3.4 - Elementary Knowledge:

3.4.1 - Request 17:

3.4.2 - Request 18:

3.4.3 - Request 19:

3.4.4 - Request 20:

3.4.5 - Request 21:

3.4.6 - Request 22:

3.4.7 - Request 23:

3.5 - Advanced Knowledge:

3.5.1 - Request 24:

3.6 - Hallucinations:

3.6.1 - Request 25:

4 - Progress:

• Through "occasional" human interventions. However, in this case, how can we guarantee that a modification in these complex neural networks does not spread and disrupt other correct information?
• By expanding the knowledge base and validating its content. In this scenario, real-time access to the Internet would be absolutely essential.
• By changing the model. Indeed, if Bard/Gemini "experimental" is solely based on GPT [01], certain problems cannot be solved by a "simple" natural language model.
• In use cases such as "encyclopedic consultation," where it is essential to distinguish between what is TRUE and what is FALSE, it might be possible to subject Bard/Gemini "experimental"'s outputs to an "adversarial" AI (as done in the field of picture synthesis or games) that would ensure their accuracy. However, this poses a significant challenge: How can we establish, validate, and update a reliable knowledge base for such an AI? But for us, beings with consciousness, doesn't it play the role of that "antagonistic" AI? Indeed, our subconscious constantly generates information (in a broad sense). When we sleep, our consciousness is no longer active, and our dreams often have the incoherence of certain outputs from Bard/Gemini "experimental". However, when we are awake, consciousness then plays the role, if necessary, of a coherence filter, particularly sorting between the TRUE and the FALSE.

• And what about environmental issues regarding the consumption of eletricity and water necessary for the proprer functioning of these systems? We shall note in passing that the human brain (and of all living beings...) does not have the same needs, fortunately far from it!

5 - The problem of Consciousness:

6 - Conclusion: